Skip Navigation


The English Historical Review Advance Access originally published online on November 11, 2009
The English Historical Review 2009 CXXIV(511):1389-1421; doi:10.1093/ehr/cep348
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
CXXIV/511/1389    most recent
cep348v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Hugh Trevor-Roper, Intellectual History and ‘The Religious Origins of the Enlightenment’*

John Robertson

St Hugh's College, Oxford

Taking ‘The Religious Origins of the Enlightenment’ (1967) as its starting-point, this study in historiography traces the development of Hugh Trevor-Roper's interest in the history of ideas. While an identification with Erasmus and enjoyment of the great Enlightenment historians are evident from the early 1950s, the key to the evolution of his interests, it is argued, lies in his critical engagement in the mid and late 1950s with Weber's theses about Protestantism, capitalism, and the modern state. Reading undertaken while in Paris in 1963 brought this new direction in his interests sharply into focus, and it was reinforced later in the decade in correspondence with Frances Yates, whose work he admired and promoted. The idea of an Erasmian, Arminian or Socinian alternative to Calvinism as the religious predecessor of the Enlightenment would then inform a range of later writings, from essays on Grotius and Great Tew to the posthumous book on Mayerne. The article draws on correspondence and notes in the Trevor-Roper archive, and concludes with a characterisation of Trevor-Roper's conception of intellectual history.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.